<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009: The Black Keys Year In Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theblackkeysfanlounge.com/2009/12/2009-the-black-keys-year-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theblackkeysfanlounge.com/2009/12/2009-the-black-keys-year-in-review/</link>
	<description>Everything about The Black Keys band from the fans&#039; perspective - News, Forum, Opinions, Tour Dates, Merchandise, Interviews, MP3s, Videos, Photos, Tabs, Lyrics, Posters, Reviews &#38; more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karcer</title>
		<link>http://theblackkeysfanlounge.com/2009/12/2009-the-black-keys-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>karcer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblackkeysfanlounge.com/?p=1775#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Blakroc is one of the best, and from what I&#039;ve seen so far most under-rated, albums of 2009. Although I&#039;ve seen a few very good reviews that really &quot;got&quot; the album, by and large I&#039;ve been disappointed and a bit mystified by the sort of ho-hum reception Blakroc got from some critics, many who seemed to be just listening to tracks (or snippets of tracks) rather than the album as a whole. Do you agree, and if so, do you have any thoughts on why there&#039;s been a lukewarm response from so-called music critics to one of the most creative, spontaneous, and imaginative albums in years? Are they just so used to listening to crap they don&#039;t recognize a good thing when they hear it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blakroc is one of the best, and from what I&#8217;ve seen so far most under-rated, albums of 2009. Although I&#8217;ve seen a few very good reviews that really &#8220;got&#8221; the album, by and large I&#8217;ve been disappointed and a bit mystified by the sort of ho-hum reception Blakroc got from some critics, many who seemed to be just listening to tracks (or snippets of tracks) rather than the album as a whole. Do you agree, and if so, do you have any thoughts on why there&#8217;s been a lukewarm response from so-called music critics to one of the most creative, spontaneous, and imaginative albums in years? Are they just so used to listening to crap they don&#8217;t recognize a good thing when they hear it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

