The Black Keys Fan Lounge Forum » Articles & Interviews

Pitchfork review of El Camino (rating 7.4)

(14 posts)
  • Started 5 months ago by Moist
  • Latest reply from phillienelson

Tags:

No tags yet.


Moist

big fan
Joined: Dec '11
Posts: 78

offline

User has not uploaded an avatar

It behooves us to take 90 seconds here and figure out how this band got so popular and enduring. The Black Keys were born in the teeth of the early-aughts "Rock Is Back!" movement, wherein a cadre of uncouth garage-y bands all named The ______s saved us from the terrorists and/or the Backstreet Boys. Eventual result: deserved ignominy (the Vines), undeserved ignominy (the Hives), bewildered near-implosion (the Strokes), and bewildering total implosion (the White Stripes). The years have not been kind.

You didn't figure the Keys as sole survivors and mainstream lifers when The Big Come Up emerged in 2002 and offered a walking rockist orgasm: two gawky white dudes from Akron, Ohio, drums and surly guitar and burning-oatmeal-mouthed yawps of not terribly articulate romantic frustration, all powering cartoonishly virile garage-blues jams of prison-phone-call fidelity and sentiment. Ridiculous and kind of awesome. (This assumes racially uneasy cultural appropriation is no longer an issue for you, but if so, feel free to evoke the Blueshammer scene in the Ghost World movie and the hell with it.)

And so. They named their second album Thickfreakness; they recorded their third album in an abandoned tire factory and named it Rubber Factory. For a while there, they always did confoundingly well in critics' polls, as though they were every single rock scribe's seventh-favorite band. They evolved incredibly slowly-- you can enjoy their early work tremendously and never retain five consecutive seconds of it beyond their cover of "Have Love Will Travel". Danger Mouse got involved as a producer, to the immediately evident benefit of no one. Coupla daffy side projects in there somewhere. (BlakRoc!) Ah yes, and they got their music in a shitload of ads, from Victoria's Secret to Zales to American Express to Subaru, like just so much capitalism, to the extent that they went on The Colbert Report with Vampire Weekend and clowned themselves about it.

By which time they'd broken through. Last year's Brothers, their sixth album, had wit and pop charm and a minor hit in "Tighten Up" (and unremitting bloat, but ah), and thus came the Spin cover, the Saturday Night Live appearances, the Grammys. And now we greet El Camino, their best and (not coincidentally) goofiest album, a veritable frat-worthy "Pimp 'n' Ho" party in which T. Rex has somehow been tricked into serving as house band. The riffs are glam-nasty, the lyrics sublimely knuckleheaded, the basslines nimble and bombastic, the mood frivolous and fun and unabashedly corny. It's way shorter than Brothers, too. Sweet cars, witchy women, "Gold on the Ceiling." A bizarre attempt to philosophically combine the videos for "Sabotage" and "Legs". The fine line between a tricked-out GTO and "GTFO."

Danger Mouse figured it out, for one thing. He unnecessarily arted up 2008's Attack & Release (plus the hit off Brothers), and his angelic-choir/space-glockenspiel Super Mario Galaxy fantasias still distract-- everything's a goddamn spaghetti western with this guy. But Camino's sonic frills are mercifully few, content to stick your head right in Patrick Carney's bass drum as he stomps through the caveman jam "Hell of a Season" with virtuosic anti-virtuosity, or revel in the machine-gun surge of Dan Auerbach's gong-banging guitar on surging opener "Lonely Boy". It's a shame Rock Band is no longer a thing. "Gold on the Ceiling" is just filthy, like George Thorogood scoring porn, all raunchy organ and licentious handclaps and chorus help from ladies attempting to sound like the sorts of ladies Steely Dan loved to write songs about. "I wanna buy some time/ But don't have a dime," goes the raucous one called "Money Maker". Better cash some Subaru checks.

The lyrics! The lyrics are hilarious. Great advice, via Brothers: "Well, you can watch her strut/ But keep your mouth shut." God bless Auerbach for ignoring it, and, amid the keening/crunching stomp of "Run Right Back", dropping some serious knowledge: "Well she's a special thing/ She doesn't read too much, oh/ But there's no doubt/ She's written about." Which is really just a prelude to the miraculous five-word sequence that is "Finest exterior/ She's so superior," which, Jesus. Show me the CARFAX, Romeo. Your emotional climax is "Little Black Submarines", which starts acoustic and pathos-ridden: "A broken heart is blind," goes the biologically suspect refrain. But then, hosanna, the distortion kicks in, the riff from "Mary Jane's Last Dance" is lifted wholesale, and suddenly we are rocking, Carney and Auerbach in call-and-response/attack-and-release napalm mode, back in the rubber factory in spirit if not tax bracket.

Yes, well. Consider El Camino the aural equivalent of one of those Chrysler "Imported from Detroit" ads where a $47,000 car slowly rolls through one of the most devastated cities in America, a sign for 8 Mile Road glimpsed through tinted windows: the finest in luxury grit. Seedy, escapist camp, crass but expert, so expert. That they're the true victors of the 2000s garage explosion is no shock at all. Rock came back. Commerce never left.

http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/16098-el-camino/

Posted 5 months ago #

Funkmaster

drunken admirer
Joined: Dec '09
Posts: 393

offline

Funkmaster

they don't really bash the black keys much but fuck this reviewer and the immaturity taken to the review.

You play bass? Whats up?
Posted 5 months ago #

Mirby 2.0

tour bus driver
Joined: Apr '10
Posts: 3,575

offline

MirbyGnits

Yeah I don't get this review at all. It's more like the reviewer is trying to make THEMSELF sound cool and clever instead of telling me what the fuck is up with the new album. Boo that. Fuckin' Pitchfork... I read it and then I was like - wtf did I just read? Chug some more cough syrup mr album reviewer guy Just give the man a t-shirt that says "I work for Pitchfork & I'm clever" and send'm on his way.

Although, maybe it's just the fact that I've spent plenty of time with the album already, so reviews are really not needed or wanted.

"When the power of Love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Posted 5 months ago #

mike

drunken admirer
Joined: Sep '09
Posts: 557

offline

mike

MirbyGnits - 2 hours ago  » Just give the man a t-shirt that says "I work for Pitchfork & I'm clever" and send'm on his way.

WINNAH

Totally agree. I made it to the Ghost World reference and switched off. Dbag.

"Since huge quantities of information can be computer-digitalized and transmitted, music researchers could, for example, swap records over the Net with "essentially perfect fidelity."
- Rolling Stone, December 7, 1972
Posted 5 months ago #

Mirby 2.0

tour bus driver
Joined: Apr '10
Posts: 3,575

offline

MirbyGnits

And during his way clever compressed history of the black keys, he skipped over Chulahoma and Magic Potion completely??

I don't entirely disagree with the final rating, but man oh man, I see why Pitchfork has the reputation it does and why it's the butt of every hipster joke.

Posted 5 months ago #

crookedbill

not diehard enough
Joined: Jun '10
Posts: 14

offline

User has not uploaded an avatar

i read pitchfork quite a bit. sue me, i find it entertaining. gotta say this was one of the most "entertaining" reviews i've ever read from them. the band is mocked and slandered the whole way through, but still given a respectable 7.4? talk about a backhanded compliment. like they know the album is good, but just can't get past their own self-importance to admit it.

also, why are the keys constantly mocked for "racial and cultural appropriation" (the loaded accusation here being that they're "trying to sound black") but a hundred other white "blues rock" bands over the last 40 years (fuck it, let's just say "rock" bands, and any white rapper for that matter) living or dead aren't? that always struck me as a really cheap swipe against the keys. can't name any other band in the last decade that has been slandered for "racial appropriation" quite like the keys. unbelievable.

Posted 5 months ago #

cmc

massive fan
Joined: Nov '09
Posts: 171

offline

cmc

I think i've read the main guy at pitchfork say the score is not really tied to the actual review, lol.

I will give pitchfork some credit though, even though it's a small demographic, I think they are one of the few music reviewers with tons of clout just based on the score

Posted 5 months ago #

Funkmaster

drunken admirer
Joined: Dec '09
Posts: 393

offline

Funkmaster

more like bitchfork

fuck these guys
fuck them and their references to pop-culture

Posted 5 months ago #

misa

massive fan
Joined: Apr '11
Posts: 121

offline

misa

I actually really enjoyed the read. Kind of a non-fan perspective of TBK.

My girlfriend mostly enjoys her music based on lyrics, and suffice to say she hasn't gotten into TBK. Maybe a few smiles at "Next Girl" and just tolerates me listening to it in the car. I, on the other hand, could care less about the lyrics and am more concerned about the melody/sound.

In trying to figure out the lyrics to "Gold on the Ceiling" a couple days ago, I can't say they are anything to praise. I think it matches how I approach music making: make a great sounding melody/progression and then try to figure out some lyrics to fit into it, with perhaps a little interplay between the elements as I go through the process.

Posted 5 months ago #

YouEvil

drunken admirer
Joined: Sep '09
Posts: 481

offline

YouEvil

I thought the review was just weird. It seemed like he liked the album, but also wanted to bash the band at the same time. Typical of Pitchfork, it's some dude trying to sound smart, rather than just giving an opinion with no "smart hipster" spin. I want the time I spent reading that review back...

"We run this shit like a Wendy's. We're open for breakfast every morning."
Posted 5 months ago #

misa

massive fan
Joined: Apr '11
Posts: 121

offline

misa

It should probably be considered a humor piece in the form of an album review.

Posted 5 months ago #

Loht773

drunken admirer
Joined: May '11
Posts: 207

offline

Loht773

I felt this was more of a critic to the bands new style than a review of the album, he mocks the fact that they have gone more commercial, which yeah it's true, however I like the album it still has that vintage feel that makes The Black Keys special. What I do not like is the overwhelming amount of instruments Danger Mouse has applied to the album, they dont sound like a two piece band anymore (on Brothers the ammount of instruments wasent that massive) so I would like it if their next album is produced by themselves rather than Dangermouse, I mean they are more than capable of doing an amazing album without a "third band member".

It's gonna be loud, are you ready? -Dan
Posted 5 months ago #

LearnedHand

not diehard enough
Joined: Mar '11
Posts: 12

offline

LearnedHand

It's more like the reviewer is trying to make THEMSELF sound cool and clever instead of telling me what the fuck is up with the new album.

Mirby, I think you just described the soul of Pitchfork.

Posted 5 months ago #

phillienelson

massive fan
Joined: Mar '10
Posts: 176

offline

phillienelson

Sounds like this guy was stroking himself as he wrote this.

Posted 5 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.